What changed
The current rating, prior result, and direction of change.
── METHODOLOGY
Velocity Rating is a decision-support signal — not an appraisal or guaranteed outcome. It shows the direction of athlete momentum based on the latest available performance, media exposure, social, and public-risk evidence.
Traditional metrics describe a point in time. Velocity Rating shows direction based on the latest available evidence and makes the contributing inputs visible.
A high Velocity Rating doesn't mean an athlete is "worth more" — it indicates stronger momentum across the available performance, visibility, social, and public-risk signals. It does not predict a deal, payment, or future result.
Revenue sharing, third-party NIL compensation, collective support, commercial endorsements, and non-cash benefits are separate categories. Velocity Rating does not combine them into a claim about an athlete's worth.
── THE SCORE RECEIPT
The score receipt separates measured facts, model outputs, and recommended actions so users can understand the result before relying on it.
The current rating, prior result, and direction of change.
The sources and inputs that contributed to the result.
When the rating and its underlying information were last updated.
Data gaps are disclosed and are not treated as negative evidence.
Plain-language context for model outputs, including lower-is-better public risk.
Athletes can verify identity, correct profile information, and review permissions.
── THE INPUTS
Each pillar is computed independently and then combined into a single composite — with the inputs always visible so you can see exactly what's driving the score.
On-field or on-court production, role usage, and trajectory. Performance is one input to momentum, not a guarantee of NIL opportunity.
Public coverage and visibility signals. The underlying stories, source context, and update timing remain available for review.
Connected audience and engagement trends. Missing, stale, or unverified account data is identified instead of treated as a negative result.
Potentially adverse signals found in public sources, presented with evidence and context. Lower is better, and every signal requires human review.
── PRACTICAL USE
Use an executive briefing to see material roster changes, evidence gaps, and athlete-support priorities with clear owners and next actions.
Evaluate school-aligned athletes, monitor a permission-backed portfolio, and keep pending or declined requests separate from confirmed relationships.
Review the score receipt, see what changed, connect missing information, correct profile details, and understand practical next steps.
Compare athlete momentum and audience fit with visible evidence, freshness, and limitations instead of relying on opaque rankings or appraisal claims.
── GET STARTED
Create an account now or request a focused walkthrough for your program.